Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Public Health Action. 2016 September 21; Volume 6 (Issue 3); 193-198.; DOI:10.5588/pha.16.0043
Shirodkar S, Anande L, Dalal A, Desai C, Correa G, et al.
Public Health Action. 2016 September 21; Volume 6 (Issue 3); 193-198.; DOI:10.5588/pha.16.0043
SETTING
While surgery for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is considered an important adjunct for specific cases, including drug-resistant tuberculosis, operational evidence on its feasibility and effectiveness is limited.
OBJECTIVE
To describe surgical outcomes and programmatic challenges of providing surgery for PTB in Mumbai, India.
DESIGN
A descriptive study of routinely collected data of surgical interventions for PTB from 2010 to 2014 in two Mumbai hospitals, one public, one private.
RESULTS
Of 85 patients, 5 (6%) died and 17 (20%) had complications, with wound infection being the most frequent. Repeat operation was required in 12 (14%) patients. Most procedures were performed on an emergency basis, and eligibility was established late in the course of treatment. Median time from admission to surgery was 51 days. Drug susceptibility test (DST) patterns and final treatment outcomes were not systematically collected.
CONCLUSION
In a high-burden setting such as Mumbai, important data on surgery for PTB were surprisingly limited in both the private and public sectors. Eligibility for surgery was established late, culture and DST were not systematically offered, the interval between admission and surgery was long and TB outcomes were not known. Systematic data collection would allow for proper evaluation of surgery as adjunctive therapy for all forms of TB under programmatic conditions.
While surgery for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is considered an important adjunct for specific cases, including drug-resistant tuberculosis, operational evidence on its feasibility and effectiveness is limited.
OBJECTIVE
To describe surgical outcomes and programmatic challenges of providing surgery for PTB in Mumbai, India.
DESIGN
A descriptive study of routinely collected data of surgical interventions for PTB from 2010 to 2014 in two Mumbai hospitals, one public, one private.
RESULTS
Of 85 patients, 5 (6%) died and 17 (20%) had complications, with wound infection being the most frequent. Repeat operation was required in 12 (14%) patients. Most procedures were performed on an emergency basis, and eligibility was established late in the course of treatment. Median time from admission to surgery was 51 days. Drug susceptibility test (DST) patterns and final treatment outcomes were not systematically collected.
CONCLUSION
In a high-burden setting such as Mumbai, important data on surgery for PTB were surprisingly limited in both the private and public sectors. Eligibility for surgery was established late, culture and DST were not systematically offered, the interval between admission and surgery was long and TB outcomes were not known. Systematic data collection would allow for proper evaluation of surgery as adjunctive therapy for all forms of TB under programmatic conditions.
Conference Material > Slide Presentation
Khan S, Silsarma A, Iyer AS, Galindo MA, Chavan VV, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2023. 2023 June 7; DOI:10.57740/0dpv-wz08
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 2020 June 16 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234651.
Chavan VV, Dalal A, Nagaraja SB, Thekkur P, Mansoor H, et al.
PLOS One. 2020 June 16 (Issue 6); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234651.
Background
Imipenem, an intravenous antibiotic is recommended for use in drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) when an effective regimen with combination of other second line drugs is not possible. Though the treatment success rates with carbapenems are promising, the twice daily injection of Imipenem usually requires patients to be hospitalized. The Médecins Sans Frontières independent clinic in Mumbai, India implemented ambulatory and home based management of patients receiving Imipenem through the use of port-a-cath.
Objective
We aimed to describe the adverse events and treatment outcomes of ambulatory pre- and XDR-TB patients initiated on imipenem through port-a-cath between January 2015 and June 2018 and to explore the challenges with this regimen as perceived by healthcare providers and patients.
Methods
A convergent mixed methods study with quantitative (longitudinal descriptive study using the routine data) and qualitative (descriptive study) part conducted concurrently. For the quantitative component, all XDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB initiated on imipenem containing regimen during January 2015-June 2018 were included. For qualitative component, interviews were carried out including patients who initiated on imipenem (n = 5) and healthcare providers (n = 7) involved in providing treatment. Treatment outcomes, culture conversion and adverse events during treatment were described. Thematic analysis was carried out for qualitative component.
Results
Of the 70 patients included, the mean age was 28.1 (standard deviation: 11.2) years and 36 (51.4%) were females. Fifty one (72.9%) had XDR-TB. All patients were resistant to fluoroquinilone, levofloxacin. Vomiting was reported by 55 (78.6%) patients and at least one episode of QTC prolongation (more than 500 msec by Fredrecia method) was detected in 25 (35.7%). Port-a-cath block and infection was seen in 11 (15.7%) and 20 (28.6%) patients respectively. Favourable outcomes were seen in 43 (61.4%) patients. Mortality was seen in 22 (31.4%) patients, 2 (2.9%) were lost-to-follow-up and 3 (4.3%) were declared as treatment failure. The overarching theme of the qualitative analysis was: Challenges in delivering Imipenem via port-a-cath device in ambulatory care. Major challenges identified were difficulties in adhering to drug dose timelines, vomiting, restricted mobility due to port-a-cath, paucity of infection control and space constraints at patients’ home for optimal care.
Conclusion
Administration of imipenem was feasible through port-a-cath. Though outcomes with ambulatory based imipenem containing regimens were promising, there were several challenges in providing care. The feasibility of infusion at day care facilities needs to explored to overcome challenges in infusion at patients home.
Imipenem, an intravenous antibiotic is recommended for use in drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) when an effective regimen with combination of other second line drugs is not possible. Though the treatment success rates with carbapenems are promising, the twice daily injection of Imipenem usually requires patients to be hospitalized. The Médecins Sans Frontières independent clinic in Mumbai, India implemented ambulatory and home based management of patients receiving Imipenem through the use of port-a-cath.
Objective
We aimed to describe the adverse events and treatment outcomes of ambulatory pre- and XDR-TB patients initiated on imipenem through port-a-cath between January 2015 and June 2018 and to explore the challenges with this regimen as perceived by healthcare providers and patients.
Methods
A convergent mixed methods study with quantitative (longitudinal descriptive study using the routine data) and qualitative (descriptive study) part conducted concurrently. For the quantitative component, all XDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB initiated on imipenem containing regimen during January 2015-June 2018 were included. For qualitative component, interviews were carried out including patients who initiated on imipenem (n = 5) and healthcare providers (n = 7) involved in providing treatment. Treatment outcomes, culture conversion and adverse events during treatment were described. Thematic analysis was carried out for qualitative component.
Results
Of the 70 patients included, the mean age was 28.1 (standard deviation: 11.2) years and 36 (51.4%) were females. Fifty one (72.9%) had XDR-TB. All patients were resistant to fluoroquinilone, levofloxacin. Vomiting was reported by 55 (78.6%) patients and at least one episode of QTC prolongation (more than 500 msec by Fredrecia method) was detected in 25 (35.7%). Port-a-cath block and infection was seen in 11 (15.7%) and 20 (28.6%) patients respectively. Favourable outcomes were seen in 43 (61.4%) patients. Mortality was seen in 22 (31.4%) patients, 2 (2.9%) were lost-to-follow-up and 3 (4.3%) were declared as treatment failure. The overarching theme of the qualitative analysis was: Challenges in delivering Imipenem via port-a-cath device in ambulatory care. Major challenges identified were difficulties in adhering to drug dose timelines, vomiting, restricted mobility due to port-a-cath, paucity of infection control and space constraints at patients’ home for optimal care.
Conclusion
Administration of imipenem was feasible through port-a-cath. Though outcomes with ambulatory based imipenem containing regimens were promising, there were several challenges in providing care. The feasibility of infusion at day care facilities needs to explored to overcome challenges in infusion at patients home.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
PLOS One. 2015 January 21; Volume 10 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0116798
Dalal A, Pawaskar A, Das M, Desari R, Prabhudesai P, et al.
PLOS One. 2015 January 21; Volume 10 (Issue 1); DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0116798
While the high burden of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) itself is a matter of great concern, the emergence and rise of advanced forms of drug-resistance such as extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) and extremely drug-resistant TB (XXDR-TB) is more troubling. The aim of this study was to investigate the trends over time of patterns of drug resistance in a sample of MDR-TB patients in greater metropolitan Mumbai, India.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 November 2; Volume 73 (Issue 9); e3496-e3504.; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1577
Das M, Dalal A, Laxmeshwar C, Ravi S, Mamnoon F, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 November 2; Volume 73 (Issue 9); e3496-e3504.; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1577
BACKGROUND
The Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai, India, has been providing concomitant bedaquiline (BDQ) and delamanid (DLM) in treatment regimen for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) and limited therapeutic options, referred from other healthcare institutions, since 2016. The study documents the end-of-treatment outcomes, culture-conversion rates, and serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study based on routinely collected program data. In clinic, treatment regimens are designed based on culture drug sensitivity test patterns and previous drug exposures, and are provided for 20-22 months. BDQ and DLM are extended beyond 24 weeks as off-label use. Patients who initiated DR-TB treatment including BDQ and DLM (concomitantly for at least 4 weeks) during February 2016-February 2018 were included.
RESULTS
Of the 70 patients included, the median age was 25 (interquartile range [IQR], 22-32) years and 56% were females. All except 1 were fluoroquinolone resistant. The median duration of exposure to BDQ and DLM was 77 (IQR, 43-96) weeks. Thirty-nine episodes of SAEs were reported among 30 (43%) patients, including 5 instances of QTc prolongation, assessed as possibly related to BDQ and/or DLM. The majority (69%) had culture conversion before 24 weeks of treatment. In 61 (87%), use of BDQ and DLM was extended beyond 24 weeks. Successful end-of-treatment outcomes were reported in 49 (70%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The successful treatment outcomes of this cohort show that regimens including concomitant BDQ and DLM for longer than 24 weeks are effective and can be safely administered on an ambulatory basis. National TB programs globally should scale up access to life-saving DR-TB regimens with new drugs.
The Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai, India, has been providing concomitant bedaquiline (BDQ) and delamanid (DLM) in treatment regimen for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) and limited therapeutic options, referred from other healthcare institutions, since 2016. The study documents the end-of-treatment outcomes, culture-conversion rates, and serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study based on routinely collected program data. In clinic, treatment regimens are designed based on culture drug sensitivity test patterns and previous drug exposures, and are provided for 20-22 months. BDQ and DLM are extended beyond 24 weeks as off-label use. Patients who initiated DR-TB treatment including BDQ and DLM (concomitantly for at least 4 weeks) during February 2016-February 2018 were included.
RESULTS
Of the 70 patients included, the median age was 25 (interquartile range [IQR], 22-32) years and 56% were females. All except 1 were fluoroquinolone resistant. The median duration of exposure to BDQ and DLM was 77 (IQR, 43-96) weeks. Thirty-nine episodes of SAEs were reported among 30 (43%) patients, including 5 instances of QTc prolongation, assessed as possibly related to BDQ and/or DLM. The majority (69%) had culture conversion before 24 weeks of treatment. In 61 (87%), use of BDQ and DLM was extended beyond 24 weeks. Successful end-of-treatment outcomes were reported in 49 (70%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The successful treatment outcomes of this cohort show that regimens including concomitant BDQ and DLM for longer than 24 weeks are effective and can be safely administered on an ambulatory basis. National TB programs globally should scale up access to life-saving DR-TB regimens with new drugs.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019 January 1; Volume 23 (Issue 1); 73-81.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.18.0149
Laxmeshwar C, Stewart AG, Dalal A, Kumar AMV, Kalaiselvi S, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019 January 1; Volume 23 (Issue 1); 73-81.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.18.0149
SETTING
Two drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) sites (MSF Clinic, Jupiter Hospital) in Mumbai, India.
OBJECTIVE
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and associated factors among DR-TB patients and explore their perspectives about HRQoL.
DESIGN
We used a mixed-methods design: a quantitative cross-sectional questionnaire (the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire [WHOQoL-BREF]); and qualitative in-depth interviews for purposively selected patients. Assessments were conducted between April and November 2016.
RESULTS
Ninety-five patients completed WHOQoL-BREF; 12 were interviewed. The psychological and physical health domains were the most affected (mean scores 56.2 ± standard deviation [SD] 18.3, and 56.5 ± SD 15.1, respectively; maximum 100). The social relations and environmental domains mean scores were respectively 68.6 (SD ±21.1) and 60.3 (SD ±15.9). Loss of jobs due to TB adversely affected the social relations and environmental domains. Qualitative analysis showed that support was the most important theme affecting quality of life. Other themes were physical factors (e.g., treatment adverse events), psychological factors (e.g., depression), social functioning (e.g., fear of stigmatisation) and environmental factors (e.g., health systems).
CONCLUSION
HRQoL was lower among study participants, but not as low as previously reported among TB patients. Support was the main factor that positively affected HRQoL, although both disease and treatment were physically and socially challenging.
Two drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) sites (MSF Clinic, Jupiter Hospital) in Mumbai, India.
OBJECTIVE
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and associated factors among DR-TB patients and explore their perspectives about HRQoL.
DESIGN
We used a mixed-methods design: a quantitative cross-sectional questionnaire (the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire [WHOQoL-BREF]); and qualitative in-depth interviews for purposively selected patients. Assessments were conducted between April and November 2016.
RESULTS
Ninety-five patients completed WHOQoL-BREF; 12 were interviewed. The psychological and physical health domains were the most affected (mean scores 56.2 ± standard deviation [SD] 18.3, and 56.5 ± SD 15.1, respectively; maximum 100). The social relations and environmental domains mean scores were respectively 68.6 (SD ±21.1) and 60.3 (SD ±15.9). Loss of jobs due to TB adversely affected the social relations and environmental domains. Qualitative analysis showed that support was the most important theme affecting quality of life. Other themes were physical factors (e.g., treatment adverse events), psychological factors (e.g., depression), social functioning (e.g., fear of stigmatisation) and environmental factors (e.g., health systems).
CONCLUSION
HRQoL was lower among study participants, but not as low as previously reported among TB patients. Support was the main factor that positively affected HRQoL, although both disease and treatment were physically and socially challenging.
Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 July 1; Volume 27 (Issue 7); 567-569.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.22.0632
Vengurlekar D, Walker C, Mahajan R, Dalal A, Chavan VV, et al.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 July 1; Volume 27 (Issue 7); 567-569.; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.22.0632
Conference Material > Poster
Mongia H, Mansoor H, Mamnoon F, Silsarma A, Davuluri P, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2022. 2022 May 9; DOI:10.57740/4qe4-m903
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 October 20; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1577
Das M, Dalal A, Laxmeshwar C, Ravi S, Mamnoon F, et al.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 October 20; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1577
Background
Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai, India has been providing concomitant Bedaquiline (BDQ) and Delamanid (DLM) in treatment regimen for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) and limited therapeutic options, referred from other healthcare institutions, since 2016. The study documents the end-of-treatment outcomes, culture-conversion rates, and serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study based on routinely collected programme data. In clinic, treatment regimens are designed based on culture-drug sensitivity test patterns, previous drug-exposures and are provided for 20-22 months. The BDQ and DLM are extended beyond 24 weeks as off-label use. Patients who initiated DR-TB treatment including BDQ and DLM (concomitantly for at least 4 weeks) during February2016-February2018 were included.
Result
Of the 70 patients included, the median (IQR) age was 25(22-32) years and 56% were females. All except one were fluoroquinolone resistant. The median(IQR) duration of exposure to BDQ and DLM was 77(43-96) weeks. Thirty-nine episodes of serious-adverse-events(SAEs) were reported among 30(43%) patients, including five instances of QTc prolongation-assessed as possibly related to BDQ and/or DLM. Majority(69%) had culture conversion before 24 weeks of treatment. In 61(87%), use of BDQ and DLM was extended beyond 24 weeks. Successful end-of-treatment outcomes were reported in 49(70%) patients.
Conclusion
The successful treatment outcomes of this cohort show that regimens including concomitant bedaquiline and delamanid for longer than 24 weeks are effective and can be safely administered on ambulatory basis. National TB programmes globally should scale up access to life saving DR-TB regimens with new drugs.
Médecins Sans Frontières clinic in Mumbai, India has been providing concomitant Bedaquiline (BDQ) and Delamanid (DLM) in treatment regimen for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) and limited therapeutic options, referred from other healthcare institutions, since 2016. The study documents the end-of-treatment outcomes, culture-conversion rates, and serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study based on routinely collected programme data. In clinic, treatment regimens are designed based on culture-drug sensitivity test patterns, previous drug-exposures and are provided for 20-22 months. The BDQ and DLM are extended beyond 24 weeks as off-label use. Patients who initiated DR-TB treatment including BDQ and DLM (concomitantly for at least 4 weeks) during February2016-February2018 were included.
Result
Of the 70 patients included, the median (IQR) age was 25(22-32) years and 56% were females. All except one were fluoroquinolone resistant. The median(IQR) duration of exposure to BDQ and DLM was 77(43-96) weeks. Thirty-nine episodes of serious-adverse-events(SAEs) were reported among 30(43%) patients, including five instances of QTc prolongation-assessed as possibly related to BDQ and/or DLM. Majority(69%) had culture conversion before 24 weeks of treatment. In 61(87%), use of BDQ and DLM was extended beyond 24 weeks. Successful end-of-treatment outcomes were reported in 49(70%) patients.
Conclusion
The successful treatment outcomes of this cohort show that regimens including concomitant bedaquiline and delamanid for longer than 24 weeks are effective and can be safely administered on ambulatory basis. National TB programmes globally should scale up access to life saving DR-TB regimens with new drugs.
Conference Material > Abstract
Khan S, Silsarma A, Iyer AS, Galindo MA, Chavan VV, et al.
MSF Scientific Days International 2023. 2023 June 7; DOI:10.57740/k4rh-s938
INTRODUCTION
Bedaquiline (BDQ) and linezolid (LZD) are Group A drugs and form part of shorter and longer BDQ-based regimens under India’s National Tuberculosis (TB) Programme. A systematic review including some data from India on acquired BDQ resistance reports 2.2% phenotypic and 4.4% genotypic resistance in patients treated with BDQ-based regimens. The pooled frequency of LZD resistance among drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) isolates was 4.2% in a different study. The emergence of resistance to BDQ is concerning as it results in difficulties in constructing regimens, and is associated with unsuccessful treatment outcomes among DR-TB patients. Since 2015, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has provided treatment for TB patients in Mumbai with extensive resistance patterns, who need newer drugs and have limited treatment options under India’s National TB Elimination Programme.
METHODS
We carried out a descriptive retrospective study of routinely collected programmatic data from December 2020 to February 2022. The study population consisted of culture-positive DR-TB patients with BDQ and LZD exposure for over one month, referred to the MSF clinic with 1) suspected or confirmed treatment failure; 2) DR-TB diagnosed household contacts of BDQ-exposed DR-TB patients.
ETHICS
This research fulfilled the exemption criteria set by the MSF Ethics Review Board (ERB) for a posteriori analyses of routinely collected clinical data, and thus did not require MSF ERB review.
RESULTS
88 culture-positive samples were subjected to BDQ and LZD drug susceptibility testing (DST). Of these, 27 showed resistance to BDQ, LZD, or both. 22.7% (20/88) showed BDQ resistance, 17% (15/88) LZD resistance, and eight patients (9%) were simultaneously resistant to BDQ and LZD. Of 88 samples, two were DR-TB diagnosed contacts of BDQ-exposed index cases, and the remaining were BDQ-exposed patients (> one month). In the resistant cohort of 27, equal proportions were male and female, and mean exposure to all Group A drugs was 14 months. 74% (20/27) patients had bilateral disease; 26% (7/27) had unilateral disease, of which 67% (18/27) had lung cavities. Simultaneous resistance to clofazimine and fluoroquinolones was found among 30% (8/27) and 78% (21/27) patients respectively. Within the resistant cohort, two patients refused treatment and 25 started on treatment. Out of 25 patients starting treatment, 8% (2/25) successfully completed treatment, 48% (12/25) died, 20% (5/25) failed, 4% (1/25) were lost to follow-up, and 20% (5/25) were still on treatment at the time of analysis. Of the five patients still on treatment patients, two culture-converted and three are still culture-positive after three months of treatment.
CONCLUSION
We observed a high proportion of BDQ and LZD resistance in patients who previously failed on BDQ and LZD-based regimens. We observe high mortality and unsuccessful outcomes in treating such cases. Designing effective treatment regimens for patients with retreatment episodes and a history of BDQ and LZD exposure is extremely challenging. We urgently recommend increased programmatic access to DST for LZD and BDQ, to ensure early access to effective regimens.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared
Bedaquiline (BDQ) and linezolid (LZD) are Group A drugs and form part of shorter and longer BDQ-based regimens under India’s National Tuberculosis (TB) Programme. A systematic review including some data from India on acquired BDQ resistance reports 2.2% phenotypic and 4.4% genotypic resistance in patients treated with BDQ-based regimens. The pooled frequency of LZD resistance among drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) isolates was 4.2% in a different study. The emergence of resistance to BDQ is concerning as it results in difficulties in constructing regimens, and is associated with unsuccessful treatment outcomes among DR-TB patients. Since 2015, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has provided treatment for TB patients in Mumbai with extensive resistance patterns, who need newer drugs and have limited treatment options under India’s National TB Elimination Programme.
METHODS
We carried out a descriptive retrospective study of routinely collected programmatic data from December 2020 to February 2022. The study population consisted of culture-positive DR-TB patients with BDQ and LZD exposure for over one month, referred to the MSF clinic with 1) suspected or confirmed treatment failure; 2) DR-TB diagnosed household contacts of BDQ-exposed DR-TB patients.
ETHICS
This research fulfilled the exemption criteria set by the MSF Ethics Review Board (ERB) for a posteriori analyses of routinely collected clinical data, and thus did not require MSF ERB review.
RESULTS
88 culture-positive samples were subjected to BDQ and LZD drug susceptibility testing (DST). Of these, 27 showed resistance to BDQ, LZD, or both. 22.7% (20/88) showed BDQ resistance, 17% (15/88) LZD resistance, and eight patients (9%) were simultaneously resistant to BDQ and LZD. Of 88 samples, two were DR-TB diagnosed contacts of BDQ-exposed index cases, and the remaining were BDQ-exposed patients (> one month). In the resistant cohort of 27, equal proportions were male and female, and mean exposure to all Group A drugs was 14 months. 74% (20/27) patients had bilateral disease; 26% (7/27) had unilateral disease, of which 67% (18/27) had lung cavities. Simultaneous resistance to clofazimine and fluoroquinolones was found among 30% (8/27) and 78% (21/27) patients respectively. Within the resistant cohort, two patients refused treatment and 25 started on treatment. Out of 25 patients starting treatment, 8% (2/25) successfully completed treatment, 48% (12/25) died, 20% (5/25) failed, 4% (1/25) were lost to follow-up, and 20% (5/25) were still on treatment at the time of analysis. Of the five patients still on treatment patients, two culture-converted and three are still culture-positive after three months of treatment.
CONCLUSION
We observed a high proportion of BDQ and LZD resistance in patients who previously failed on BDQ and LZD-based regimens. We observe high mortality and unsuccessful outcomes in treating such cases. Designing effective treatment regimens for patients with retreatment episodes and a history of BDQ and LZD exposure is extremely challenging. We urgently recommend increased programmatic access to DST for LZD and BDQ, to ensure early access to effective regimens.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared